top of page

February 01, 2024. MEXICO CITY, Mexico.



• The Mexican diplomatic headquarters in Ecuador must stop intervening in the criminal process of the former government official of Rafael Correa, sentenced by the Ecuadorian justice system to eight years in prison for criminal association: Mariana Gómez del Campo, Secretary of International Affairs of the CEN of the PAN.



 • It is shameful that the Foreign Ministry and the Mexican Government continue to damage bilateral relations with the countries of the region.


National Action urgently urges the Mexican Foreign Ministry so that in the case of the former vice president of Ecuador, Jorge Glas Espinel, our Embassy stops being used as a refuge for a fugitive from justice.


Since December 17, 2023, Jorge Glas Espinel, former vice president of Ecuador, has been taking refuge in the Mexican Embassy; The former official of Rafael Correa's government was sentenced to eight years in prison for criminal association in the Odebrecht case and for bribery in the 2012-2016 Bribery case. He currently has a prison order.


Jorge Glas was serving part of his sentence for corruption in freedom. However, the Prosecutor's Office requested his location to comply with judicial proceedings in the case for which he is being investigated, so he appeared at the headquarters of the Mexican Embassy to request his entry and safeguard; It is unacceptable that in this government he is abusing the figure of political asylum to protect criminals who are fugitives from justice.


The Mexican Foreign Ministry must stop obstructing the work of the Ecuadorian Prosecutor's Office immediately. Let us remember that during this administration they have already appointed Ambassadors as 'non grata' people for intervening in local affairs, as has been the case in Bolivia and Peru.





Union of the Fatherland.

The match

The Justicialista Party is part of the Peronist Movement, a political current founded by Juan Domingo Perón and María Eva Duarte that includes unions, social movements, grassroots organizations and other groups.


With the formation of various party alliances, Peronism triumphed in eight presidential elections. The first ones he ran for, with Juan Perón as a candidate, in 1946 and his subsequent re-election in 1952.


After having been banned and exiled, he obtained the presidency for the third time in 1973 and died in office in 1974. Subsequently, the following were elected presidents by Peronism: Carlos Menem (1989 and 1995), Néstor Kirchner (2003) and Cristina Fernández ( 2007 and 2011).


Peronism was only defeated in democratic elections three times: 1983 (Raúl Alfonsín), 1999 (Fernando De la Rúa) and 2015 (Mauricio Macri). They also held the presidency of the Nation: María Estela Martínez (in 1974 due to the death of Juan Perón), Adolfo Rodríguez Saá (in 2001 due to the resignation of Fernando De la Rúa) and Eduardo Duhalde (in 2002 due to the resignation of Rodríguez Saá).


Two Peronist presidents were overthrown by military-led coups: Juan Perón in 1955 and María Estela Martínez in 1976. In both cases, all Peronist expressions were prohibited, and their leaders and militants were repressed, assassinated, and even disappeared.


In the first stage of the ban, which lasted 18 years, Peronism organized itself into the "Peronist Resistance" taking refuge in the action of unions and grassroots organizations. At this stage he was denied participation in two presidential elections: 1958 (Arturo Frondizi) and 1963 (Arturo Illia). In the second stage, which began in 1976, the repression worsened and was extended to other non-Peronist political forces.


With the restoration of democracy in 1983, Peronism lost a national election for the first time. But he quickly regained his predominance and maintained a majority in both chambers of the National Congress for long periods, especially in the Senate. In addition, he obtained victories in most of the provincial elections.


Currently, 14 provinces are governed by Peronists and half (36) of the national senators and more than a third (91) of the national deputies identify with this political force.


The governing bodies of the PJ are the National Council and the National Congress. The first is made up of a board of directors of 24 members, the president, five vice-presidents and 22 secretaries. Governors, presidents of provincial PJ and parliamentary blocs of the National Congress also participate. For its part, the National Congress is the "supreme body and directly represents party sovereignty," and is made up of congressmen from all over the country. These bodies are joined by a National Electoral Board, disciplinary courts and an Oversight Commission.


Likewise, the PJ recognizes the basic units distributed throughout the Argentine territory as its "primary organism." Sometimes the Party forms specific commissions such as the current Political Action Commission, made up of political and union leaders from different internal sectors of Peronism and created to promote unity in the 2019 presidential elections.


The ideas promoted by Peronism are summarized in three "flags": political sovereignty, economic independence and social justice. Peronist ideals also reflect, among other values: the centrality of work and production; the organization of workers to defend their rights and interests and solidarity in the financing of social protections; the equal dignity of all people without any distinction based on social class, ethnicity, gender, age or nationality; the promotion of the national industry; freedom and responsibility of people; the balance between the rights of individuals and the rights of society; the social function of private property, capital and economic activity; regional integration; concertation and planning of government action; the participation of the people in the political, social and economic organizations of the community; federalism and equity among the provinces; equity in access to public services, health, education, housing and tourism; the promotion of science, technology and national culture; protection of the rights of workers, families, children and the elderly; and more recently: environmental sustainability, human rights, and gender parity and diversity. housing and tourism; the promotion of science, technology and national culture; protection of the rights of workers, families, children and the elderly; and more recently: environmental sustainability, human rights, and gender parity and diversity. housing and tourism; the promotion of science, technology and national culture; protection of the rights of workers, families, children and the elderly; and more recently: environmental sustainability, human rights, and gender parity and diversity.


JUNE 20, 2023

Key Point: “Americans overwhelmingly oppose the next goal of many anti-abortion activists, to enact a federal law banning abortion nationwide. By 80%-14%, those surveyed opposed that idea, including 65% of Republicans and 83% of independents. By 53%-39%, they supported a federal law ensuring access to abortion.”

By Susan Page, Rachel Looker and Miles J. Herszenhorn


  • In what was surely a case of unintended consequences, the landmark Supreme Court decision one year ago overturning Roe v. Wade is putting abortion opponents increasingly at odds with public opinion and creating political perils for candidates on their side.

  • In a new USA TODAY/Suffolk University poll, one in four Americans say state efforts that have followed to impose strict limits on abortion access have made them more supportive of abortion rights.

  • The Dobbs decision, which removed access to abortion as a constitutionally protected right, elated the anti-abortion movement but its aftermath is helping boost support for legal abortion to historic highs and reshaping the debate over what has long been the deepest political wedge issue in the nation.

  • “I don’t think it should have been overturned,” Tanya Goodpasture, 53, of Independence, Missouri, said in a follow-up interview after being polled. A Republican who voted for Donald Trump in 2020, she expressed concern about abortion, especially after a fetus’ heartbeat could be detected. But she added: “We’re here to make our own choices and deal with the repercussions.”

  • By almost 4-1, 23%-6%, those whose views on abortion have changed in the past year said they have become more supportive of legal abortion, not less supportive. That includes more women than men, more Democrats than Republicans, and more younger voters than seniors. The shift was pronounced among Black respondents. Almost a third, 32%, said they had become more supportive of abortion access in the past year.

  • And independent women, one of the most critical swing groups in elections, by 28%-5% said they had become more supportive of abortion rights.

  • By almost 2-1, 58%-30%, those surveyed opposed the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

  • That said, more than three in four said abortion would be an important issue for them; 20% said it would be the single most important issue.

  • But Jamie Nassehi, 63, a builder and a Democrat from Silver Spring, Maryland, said access to abortion has become a more important issue to him in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling. “States are criminalizing something that was a precedent for 50 years,” he said. In a reference to the religious right and the more conservative majority on the high court, he said, “If they keep going, this country will be unrecognizable because they force their views on everybody and they’re a minority, really.”

  • Americans overwhelmingly oppose the next goal of many anti-abortion activists, to enact a federal law banning abortion nationwide. By 80%-14%, those surveyed opposed that idea, including 65% of Republicans and 83% of independents.

  • By 53%-39%, they supported a federal law ensuring access to abortion.

  • “When 80% of Democrats and 53% of independents want Congress to pass a law ensuring nationwide access to abortion, you get the picture here,” said David Paleologos, director of Suffolk University’s Political Research Center. “Among women in the all-important independent-voter demographic, 63% support a national law. Even 23% of Republican men and women support it.”

  • Since the Dobbs decision in June 2022, abortion has become unavailable in 14 states, and courts have blocked enforcement of bans in several others, according to the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks reproductive issues. Some new bans were passed by state legislatures and pre-Roe laws have gone back into effect in other states.

  • Georgia is now enforcing a ban at six weeks of pregnancy, Nebraska at 12 weeks, and Arizona and Florida at 15 weeks. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has signed a ban at six weeks, contingent on a pending state court decision. North Carolina has passed a 12-week ban, set to go into effect July 1.

  • The USA TODAY/Suffolk findings were consistent [with] other survey research. The Gallup Poll reports that support for legal abortion rose in reaction to the Dobbs decision and has remained at record highs. Last month, 69% said abortion should generally be legal in the first three months of pregnancy, the highest level since Gallup first asked the question in 1975.

  • In all, a 53% majority said abortion should be legal in most or all cases; 28% said it should be illegal in most or all cases.

  • Rebecca Romano, 35, who works in a retirement community in Mesa, Arizona, said support for legal abortion would be a “very, very big factor” for her vote. An independent, she voted for a third-party candidate in the last presidential election.

  • “I think for the health and wellness of women, it’s a huge issue,” she said. “I feel like we literally just went backwards.” She would like the Supreme Court to change course and recognize access to abortion as a constitutional right. “I feel like Roe vs. Wade needs to be turned over again,” she said.

_edited.png

A socio-corporate media platform of highlights on company news and industry events. Opinions of interests are key for post-productions in support from ASR TV.

© 2025 Alexander Solomon Report 

HomeT&C Privacy PolicyCookie Policy │Modern Slavery

bottom of page